Student Learning Outcomes

We embrace a common set of student learning outcomes and we are accountable for sustained measurement of these outcomes

Prairie View A&M University : Integration

TAMU System Student Learning Outcome–Integration of Broad Knowledge

Bold statement:

The Texas A&M University System delivers a common set/embraces a common view of important outcomes and is accountable for sustained measurement.

Institutional Effectiveness:

For all TAMU System universities, the rationale for assessing student learning outcomes (SLOs) originates primarily from efforts to maintain institutional effectiveness, which is defined as a process of identifying outcomes, assessing the extent to which they are achieved, and providing evidence of improvement based on their analysis.
Integration of Broad Knowledge Outcome: Upon completion of their degree program, students will be able to synthesize knowledge from general and specialized studies.

Generic Descriptions of Campus Assessment Results:

EXEMPLARY
All criteria met and results exceed expectations with little room for improvement.

PROFICIENT
Most criteria met and results indicate mastery of objective with some room for improvement.

SUFFICIENT
Acceptable number of criteria met and results meet expectations with room for improvement.

EMERGING
Some criteria met and results indicate need for improvement.

INSUFFICIENT
Few criteria met; results indicate need for significant improvement or no/insufficient results reported to measure performance of objective.

University

Prairie View

Assessment Method

1) ETS Proficiency Profile (Freshman vs. Senior scores)

2) NSSE senior data: 2a – “Combined ideas from different courses when completing assignments” and 2g: “Connected ideas from your courses to your prior experiences and knowledge”

3) PVAMU Graduating Student Academic Program Experience Survey (APES) Question 9 “Faculty required students to make extensive use of the library and other out-of-class resources”.

Results: 2014

1) Insufficient

2) Q2a: Sufficient Q2g: Proficient

3) Proficient

Analysis

1) ETS Profile freshman mean score 424.8 vs. senior 431.5 (7 pt increase – 50th percentile);

2)NSSE 2a: Integration of Coursework 78% responded often or very often; 2g: 86% responded often or very often;

3) APES Q9 82.2% responsed extensive use of library services.

Action

Evaluate our existing academic programming to clearly identify instances where students are provided opportunities to integrate knowledge broadly. From this assessment, develop strategies to strengthen student performance as demonstrated by a larger point gain between the freshman and senior year. Look at other best practices and high impact activities that would also enhance student performance for this SLO.

Information by System Members
Texas A&M University
Prairie View A&M University
Tarleton State University
Texas A&M International University
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi
Texas A&M University Kingsville
West Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University Commerce
Texas A&M University Texarkana
Texas A&M University Central Texas
Texas A&M University San Antonio
Skip to toolbar