Student Learning Outcomes

We embrace a common set of student learning outcomes and we are accountable for sustained measurement of these outcomes

Texas A&M University Corpus Christi: Ethical & Social Responsibility

Texas A&M University System Student Learning Outcome–Ethical & Social Responsibility

The Texas A&M University System delivers a common set/embraces a common view of important outcomes and is accountable for sustained measurement.

Institutional Effectiveness:

For all TAMU System universities, the rationale for assessing student learning outcomes (SLOs) originates primarily from efforts to maintain institutional effectiveness, which is defined as a process of identifying outcomes, assessing the extent to which they are achieved, and providing evidence of improvement based on their analysis.

ETHICAL & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEARNING OUTCOME:

Upon completion of their degree program, students will be able to demonstrate an understanding of and use ethical reasoning for responsible personal and professional decision-making in a culturally and ethnically diverse world.

Generic Descriptions of Campus Assessment Results:

EXEMPLARY
All criteria met and results exceed expectations with little room for improvement.

PROFICIENT
Most criteria met and results indicate mastery of objective with some room for improvement.

SUFFICIENT
Acceptable number of criteria met and results meet expectations with room for improvement.

EMERGING
Some criteria met and results indicate need for improvement.

INSUFFICIENT
Few criteria met; results indicate need for significant improvement or no/insufficient results reported to measure performance of objective.

UNIVERSITY

TAMU-CC

ASSESSMENT METHOD

Academic Affairs:
1) ROTC: Instill Army Values Professional Ethics. Cadets' knowledge of Army values and professional ethics are evaluated by their actions while in leadership positions.

2) COMM--A team of at least three faculty reviewers will apply a VALUE rubric to samples of student writing in order to rate the level of communication ethics. Target: Evaluated essays will earn a score above 2 (on a 4-point scale).

3) HIST: Understand social, economic, political, historical development. Exam essay answers will be evaluated with a rubric. Essays will be rated as either proficient, adequate, or unsatisfactory. Target: At least 75% of essays will be rated at least adequate in one or more of the dimensions (social, economic, political).

4) BBA: All SLOs rewritten this year. They are writing rubrics this year. Ethical & Social responsibility measured w/rubric.

5) PHIL: 4-5 page paper on biomedical ethics, assessed w/rubric.
6) CLA Core (English, Art, and Film) are measuring social responsibility (16-17) and personal responsibility (17-18). Plans include written exams, integration of perspectives in writing, and analysis of cultural biases and rules as portrayed in the film.

7) COSC/ENGN ABET E&G: Ethics and social responsibility performance indicators established.

Student Engagement and Success (SEAS):
8) Student worker responds to ethics case studies. Each rubric was read by two graders, and scores were averaged. Target: all advanced.

RESULTS: 2013

Academic Affairs:
1) ROTC: All Cadet evaluations report YES to Army values. 100% proficient

2) COMM--Ethics essays in introductory COMM course for majors scored w/VALUE rubrics. The average was 2.5, the target was a 2.0. Averagely indicates proficient in introductory outcomes.

3) HIST: Percent of essays scored adequate/ proficient in 3 areas--political, economic, and social development: 98% political; 70% economic; 80% social development. Based on the sample, students are proficient/exemplary in all three categories.

4) BBA: Results will be reported 15-16. A complete revision of assessment activities was undertaken in this AY by the college under the leadership of the college curriculum committee.

5) PHIL: Will be collected in 15-16.
6) CLA Core (English, Art, and Film) results will be reported for social responsibility (16-17) and personal responsibility (17-18).

7) COSC/ENGN ABET E & G: Performance Indicator Matrix scheduled (16-17).

SEAS:
8) 17% of students who participated in an Ethical Decision Making and Social Responsibility training in Student Engagement & Success (SES) scored "advanced" and 42% were proficient/advanced.

ANALYSIS

Academic Affairs:
While several colleges have a commitment to assessment social and/or personal responsibility, most have not yet collected or reported that data. The two programs who reported this data both met their targets.

SEAS:
147 participants from three staff and one prospective staff group. Overall score = 9.9 (Intermediate). A score of 11 out of 15 was needed to rate as Advanced. (10 < X < 11 was proficient/advanced)

ACTION

1.) The Assessment, Accreditation, & Compliance Office (AA&C Office) is coordinating the process of university-wide SLO assessment. The office is in the process of reviewing all assessment reports w/a rubric and providing feedback to departments, and assisting programs/departments in enhancing their assessment for next cycle. In this process, it will publicize both the System Student Learning Outcomes and the cycle for assessment and reporting of system SLOs.
2.) The AA&C Office is documenting the alignment of current objectives with EmpowerU outcomes, which will improve reporting.
3.) Resources will be developed by the Center for Faculty Excellence to promote the assessment of social and personal responsibility beyond the Core Curriculum.
4.) The Core Curriculum Assessment schedules will be aligned with the EmpowerU schedule.
5.) The Ethical Decision Making training workshop offered by Student Engagement (SEAS) will be altered to better focus on the application of ethical criteria to alternatives.

COMMENTS

Turnover in our AA&C Office has limited our ability to coordinate the various assessment schedules. Our goal is to better align the various outcomes and schedules to gather better results and help programs and departments make the assessment meaningful.

This year established baseline data for SEAS training in this area. The expected targets will be altered to better fit the potential of the different staff groups.

Information by System Members
Texas A&M University
Prairie View A&M University
Tarleton State University
Texas A&M International University
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi
Texas A&M University Kingsville
West Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University Commerce
Texas A&M University Texarkana
Texas A&M University Central Texas
Texas A&M University San Antonio
Skip to toolbar