Student Learning Outcomes

We embrace a common set of student learning outcomes and we are accountable for sustained measurement of these outcomes

Texas A&M University Kingsville: Critical Thinking

Texas A&M University System Student Learning Outcome–Critical Thinking

Bold statement:

The Texas A&M University System delivers a common set/embraces a common view of important outcomes and is accountable for sustained measurement.

Institutional Effectiveness:

For all TAMU System universities, the rationale for assessing student learning outcomes (SLOs) originates primarily from efforts to maintain institutional effectiveness, which is defined as a process of identifying outcomes, assessing the extent to which they are achieved, and providing evidence of improvement based on their analysis.

CRITICAL THINKING/PROBLEM SOLVING LEARNING OUTCOME:

Upon completion of their degree program, students will be able to demonstrate critical thinking, including the ability to explain issues; find, analyze, and select appropriate evidence; and construct a cogent argument that articulates conclusions and their consequences. Students will be able to utilize, qualitative and quantitative reasoning as a base for problem solving.

Generic Descriptions of Campus Assessment Results:

EXEMPLARY
All criteria met and results exceed expectations with little room for improvement.

PROFICIENT
Most criteria met and results indicate mastery of objective with some room for improvement.

SUFFICIENT
Acceptable number of criteria met and results meet expectations with room for improvement.

EMERGING
Some criteria met and results indicate need for improvement.

INSUFFICIENT
Few criteria met; results indicate need for significant improvement or no/insufficient results reported to measure performance of objective.

UNIVERSITY

TAMUK

ASSESSMENT METHOD

Course-level testing in General Education courses, and ETS Proficiency Profile testing of freshmen and seniors.

RESULTS: 2016

Sufficient/Emerging

ANALYSIS

Testing in General Education courses demonstrate that a large majority of students meet course standards for critical thinking, suggesting a rating of SUFFICIENT or better. However, ETS scores place TAMUK seniors below national averages, suggesting a rating of EMERGING. Calibrating this assessment is problematic because critical thinking receives the lowest ETS academic skill scores nationally and locally. The overall result for TAMUK is Sufficient/Emerging.

ACTION

We will continue to use General Education course-level testing and ETS testing. General Education testing will expand beyond the in-house assessment instruments to the use of Value Rubrics.

COMMENTS

ETS testing shows a slight improvement in the critical thinking score from 2014-15 to 2015-16.

Information by System Members
Texas A&M University
Prairie View A&M University
Tarleton State University
Texas A&M International University
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi
Texas A&M University Kingsville
West Texas A&M University
Texas A&M University Commerce
Texas A&M University Texarkana
Texas A&M University Central Texas
Texas A&M University San Antonio
Skip to toolbar